lol, that is an extremely vague reason for a rocket to blow up. i'd liken it to a ship that sank because water flooded it. should we have stuck with building boats that have no interior because thats a more proven and safe technology?
there has to be some progress made or else nothing would ever become economical and we'd still be hunter gatherers, if that. fixing a - specific - issue that didnt exist 50 years ago is nothing to be ashamed or scared of. being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian is. but by all means keep talking out your ass about shit you don't know anything about. :)
lol, that is an extremely vague reason for a rocket to blow up. i'd liken it to a ship that sank because water flooded it. should we have stuck with building boats that have no interior because thats a more proven and safe technology?
there has to be some progress made or else nothing would ever become economical and we'd still be hunter gatherers, if that. fixing a - specific - issue that didnt exist 50 years ago is nothing to be ashamed or scared of. being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian is. but by all means keep talking out your ass about shit you don't know anything about. :)
Repeating relatively simple mistakes that were figured out 50 years ago is something to be ashamed of, in this case.
Repeating relatively simple mistakes that were figured out 50 years ago is something to be ashamed of, in this case.
Oh I'm sorry, I missed the part where it wasn't a problem with the handling of liquid oxygen.
hahahahaha