Why? As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message, which you didn't reply to, as well as my invitation to explain why you don't seem to believe it could be a coordinated project to affect the upcoming elections.
Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories. I'm just interested in what your opinion (theory) is and why?
Why? As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message, which you didn't reply to, as well as my invitation to explain why you don't seem to believe it *could* be a coordinated project to affect the upcoming elections.
Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories. I'm just interested in what your opinion (theory) is and why?
As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message
But it gives you a clue.
Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories.
That is quite some mental gymnastics, you said "until the facts become proven" - read that back.
>As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message
But it gives you a clue.
>Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories.
That is quite some mental gymnastics, you said "until the facts become proven" - read that back.
I guess, didn't know or care. But what about the content and ideas expressed? Attacking the messenger doesn't necessarily invalidate the message. I'm not looking for an argument, I'm genuinely interested in how someone can't entertain the belief this is a coordinated event by anti-republican/Trump operatives.