Kurt Nimmo has blogged on political issues since 2002. In 2008, he worked as lead editor and writer at Infowars, and is currently a content producer for Newsbud.
>Kurt Nimmo has blogged on political issues since 2002. In 2008, he worked as lead editor and writer at Infowars, and is currently a content producer for Newsbud.
I guess, didn't know or care. But what about the content and ideas expressed? Attacking the messenger doesn't necessarily invalidate the message. I'm not looking for an argument, I'm genuinely interested in how someone can't entertain the belief this is a coordinated event by anti-republican/Trump operatives.
I guess, didn't know or care. But what about the content and ideas expressed? Attacking the messenger doesn't necessarily invalidate the message. I'm not looking for an argument, I'm genuinely interested in how someone can't entertain the belief this is a coordinated event by anti-republican/Trump operatives.
Why? As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message, which you didn't reply to, as well as my invitation to explain why you don't seem to believe it could be a coordinated project to affect the upcoming elections.
Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories. I'm just interested in what your opinion (theory) is and why?
Why? As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message, which you didn't reply to, as well as my invitation to explain why you don't seem to believe it *could* be a coordinated project to affect the upcoming elections.
Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories. I'm just interested in what your opinion (theory) is and why?
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
22 comments
I guess, didn't know or care. But what about the content and ideas expressed? Attacking the messenger doesn't necessarily invalidate the message. I'm not looking for an argument, I'm genuinely interested in how someone can't entertain the belief this is a coordinated event by anti-republican/Trump operatives.
Probably would have been a good idea to before posting it.
Why? As I said the messenger doesn't validate or invalidate the message, which you didn't reply to, as well as my invitation to explain why you don't seem to believe it could be a coordinated project to affect the upcoming elections.
Until the facts become proven, all opinions are, by definition, conspiracy theories. I'm just interested in what your opinion (theory) is and why?