7

12 comments

[–] registereduser 0 points (+0|-0) 7 years ago

2nd amendment seem applicable.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+1|-1) 7 years ago

Please have a read of the Phuks terms of service.

[–] registereduser 0 points (+0|-0) 7 years ago

What, something in the TOS prohibiting the 2nd Amendment?

Go eat a pile of rotten ass biscuits.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0) 7 years ago

Took you 2 days to come up with that? Maybe I misunderstood your comment; what exactly did you mean?

[–] offendedsexregister -1 points (+0|-1) 7 years ago

I think he means that the migrants should have guns because the 2nd amendment only prohibits the government's capacity to prohibit arms (doesn't say from who), and they would then be able to defend themselves from a government, as was intended by the 2nd amendment.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0) 7 years ago Edited 7 years ago

Oh hai account registered 6 hours ago with one comment.

[–] ScorpioGlitch 0 points (+0|-0) 7 years ago Edited 7 years ago

It certainly did though.

A well regulated Militia,

Which is citizenry.

And since only citizens and those legally here have the legal right to work and earn income, they're likely to be the only one to be able to acquire firearms with legally non-stolen or fraudulently obtained money. Possession of items purchased with illegally obtained money is still a crime. Hence, only citizens are protected under the 2nd Amendment.

Good try, though.