Well, yeah. This should be common sense. Every country you look at for immigration required applicants and entrants to have a certain amount of savings and the ability to contribute positively to the country financially. Sometimes the country goes so far as to require applicants/entrants to be in certain high demand industries.
TIL: Not being on welfare = wealthy.
No kidding. "Money over family unity" as if to say that you can't have a family and not be in abject poverty at the same time. Nothing but smear.
Well, yeah. This should be common sense. Every country you look at for immigration required applicants and entrants to have a certain amount of savings and the ability to contribute positively to the country financially. Sometimes the country goes so far as to require applicants/entrants to be in certain high demand industries.
>TIL: Not being on welfare = wealthy.
No kidding. "Money over family unity" as if to say that you can't have a family and not be in abject poverty at the same time. Nothing but smear.
This should be common sense.
Exactly.
It's bad enough we have a welfare state among our own citizens, we certainly don't need to import more of this problem.
>This should be common sense.
Exactly.
It's bad enough we have a welfare state among our own citizens, we certainly don't need to import more of this problem.
Good. Any immigrants we accept should be fully capable of supporting themselves.
TIL: Not being on welfare = wealthy.
Where do they find these people?