6

4 comments

[–] CDanger 1 points (+1|-0)

This stinginess really couldn't have saved them that much money. Sure, ingredients cost money, but I'm sure their profit margin is large, so sales volume matters far more than cost. But it sure does leave a bad taste in the mouths of cutomers.

Undoubtedly some MBA exec got a fat bonus for the maybe $30 million a year savings in ingredients that this saves while they ignore the lasting harm done to the brand (but this is much more difficult to measure and won't impact that phuker's bonus). I for one make mental note anytime a company makes a move like this and accordingly don't give them future business.