When asked about Primark’s supply chain, a representative for Stonewall said in a statement that international businesses often operate in countries “where the context for L.G.B.T. people can be challenging.”
BS words like "context" and "challenging" from PR spokesmen like this make me embarassed to be the same species. Nobody with a brain will respect your company/charity anymore for trying to be deceptive like this. Just be honest and say "Yes, a lot factories operate in countries that have human rights records that can be improved. We hope our influence there can play a small part in leading to improvement. We also receive money from this company, so this creates a conflict of interest and other groups can make a more objective statement on this." Phuk corporate bootlickers like this guy.
> When asked about Primark’s supply chain, a representative for Stonewall said in a statement that international businesses often operate in countries “where the context for L.G.B.T. people can be challenging.”
BS words like "context" and "challenging" from PR spokesmen like this make me embarassed to be the same species. Nobody with a brain will respect your company/charity anymore for trying to be deceptive like this. Just be honest and say "Yes, a lot factories operate in countries that have human rights records that can be improved. We hope our influence there can play a small part in leading to improvement. We also receive money from this company, so this creates a conflict of interest and other groups can make a more objective statement on this." Phuk corporate bootlickers like this guy.
No memes or images. Exceptions may be made in the case of images of an ongoing news story becoming available.
User-edited titles are not allowed. Copy the headline directly and use it as the post title. Corrections in spelling or minor alterations may be acceptable.
News articles written over a month before posting must have the date of the article in the post title.
No paywalls. Use an archived link to post a paywalled article.
BS words like "context" and "challenging" from PR spokesmen like this make me embarassed to be the same species. Nobody with a brain will respect your company/charity anymore for trying to be deceptive like this. Just be honest and say "Yes, a lot factories operate in countries that have human rights records that can be improved. We hope our influence there can play a small part in leading to improvement. We also receive money from this company, so this creates a conflict of interest and other groups can make a more objective statement on this." Phuk corporate bootlickers like this guy.