3

15 comments

context and nuance

You seem to think they are not important in the classification of terrorism, or southern culture. Those issues are black and white? But you do want me to apply it when considering your history. I don't intend to offened, but that is hypocritical.

I don't think we're being productive anymore, though.

[–] Boukert [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

You seem to think they are not important in the classification of terrorism, or southern culture. Those issues are black and white? But you do want me to apply it when considering your history. I don't intend to offened, but that is hypocritical.

I rebuke you accusation of hypocrasy (dont worry i'm not easily offended and see this thread in the context of a debate) As i've been offering my viewpoints and reasoning of both the car attack, the statue removal and Southern culture in nuance and context all trough our exchange.

I expect you to apply context and nuance when you start making comparrisons to prove a point. The comparrison you made was as crooked as comparing Washington with Lee and not workable in your case.

  • Washington: United a nation, Won a war, lived in a time when slavery was custom

  • Lee: Divided a nation, Lost a war, Lived in a time when slavery was heavily critised and fought to preserve it.

  • Admiral De Ruyter, United a nation, Won multiple wars, Lived in a time when slavery was custom.

I don't think we're being productive anymore, though.

I agree. It was enjoyable though and i tip my hat in respect and friendship.