https://i.imgtc.com/5qhhaiZ.png
I haven't bothered to label the territories for a first sketch, but I hope it is understandable enough.
Unit Distribution:
- Byzantinum (yellow) - A Athens, F Constantinople, A Smyrna
- Crusader States (pink) - F England, A Prussia, F Malta, A Outremer
- Hungary (brown) - F Croatia, A Budapest, F Siebenbürgen
- Mameluk Sultanate (green) - F Egypt EC, A Bedouins, A Moors
- Seljuk Sultanate (blue) - A Mecca (note: only partially on map)
The dark grey areas aren't defined yet.
In the north east beyond Novgorod and Kievan Rus, there are going to be a couple more of neutral inland SCs along with the Golden Horde home SC.
In the south-east, another couple of inland Middle East SCs, the rest of the Seljuk Sultanate, and of course the Il-Khanate and the Ghore Sultanate.
The Atlantic and the Red Sea are connected south of South Africa. South Africa is a neutral water-way allowing access to Atlantic and Red Sea by fleets, and to the Mameluk home SCs by armies.
Some notes that might not be immediately apparent:
- Hungary and Byzantinum face a very similar situation about the Black Sea as Turkey and Russia in Calhamer. They could get along with Byzantinum taking the Black Sea and the Crimea SC, while Hungary creeps along the Coast to the Kievan Rus SC, but that will take trust, and the deal could fall apart any autumn turn thanks to the Chaos rules (which permit to build in any SC, not just in the 3-4 home SCs).
- Hungary has a save grab with Venice, while the Crusaders have a save grab with Rome. As in the first year both can be taken only by fleet and they don't share a coast, this is initially drama-free, but could lead to conflict later as armies can be built.
- Jerusalem may be the most contested SC in the early game, being reachable in Spring by all of the Mameluks, Seljuks and Crusaders. The Crusaders can take it, but will forsake Antioch to Byzantinum in doing so. The Mameluks can take it, but will then forsake the strategically important Red Sea and South Africa early on. (The Seljuks should face a similar dilemma that I will need to think about more as I move to the Middle Eastern theatre.)
- Crusaders start out thinly spread, but have a wide selection of openings in the early game. With F (Eng) - ATL and A (Pru) - Sax, in Autumn the Northern army could be convoied anywhere from Normandy to South Africa to put pressure on the Mameluks for the price of forsaking the Rus SCs. F (Mal) - Eastern Mediterranean could be a strong push into the Middle East, or a pretext for a convoi into deserted Byzantine SCs. Or they could play it safe by taking Rome with F Mal and putting F Eng into the Atlantic while their two isolated armies surf on the curtails of an ally.
Again, this is kind of with a passing glance, but my first thoughts -
Reintroduction of the Aegean is a decent change and does stymie the major problem; remember that most powers can potentially threaten an enemy home center in F1901 on the base board too.
Giving three units to 4 SCs at the start is interesting. You might also consider changing Malta to an Army - making it a dead until unless you can get another power to convoy you off or you get your north fleet down there.
Cyprus with land bridge to Outremer is not a bad idea either. It allows them to potentially consolidate and hold their Middle East holdings for a good chunk of time; right now it seems to be optimal CS strategy is just GTFO and consolidate elsewhere.
I don't think the land bridge helps at all. From home centers (which matter less, I know, build anywhere, but you can't build in any other SC until F1902 at the earliest), you're still three turns away from walking into England assuming no resistance. The main way to take England will still be fleets, and the large water provinces only reinforce that; You can get there from Moors in only two turns, same with Iberia; The Mamluks will be the main opponent to CS naval control of the Atlantic and West Med. The land bridge does become relevant if Moors falls and CS have undisputed control over the West Med. But in such a case, I would expect them to sweep this part of the board in short order, unless all local powers stop fighting and begin to fight back. If CS can control Moors and Iberia, I would expect them to have complete naval dominance over the Med in short order, and then dominate this part of the map some time after. There are only three inland supply centers on the map. Naval control is massively important; further there aren't that many water spaces, so you can move around very quickly with a fleet. I don't know how this map will connect with others and whether you can move fleets out of the Med to other useful areas of the board.
My gut suggestion is that land spaces should be bigger (to reflect the large scale of the map overall) or there should be more water spaces to slow down fleets. Again, this is a off-the-cuff analysis. A couple years of sample moves would probably be a better indicator; which I would enjoy helping you do if we can sit down together sometime (or even on here through the turtle method).