-5

48 comments

[–] ScorpioGlitch 1 points (+1|-0)

Not sure who downvoted you. This is a conspiracy theory. /s/conspiracy doesn't sound like the place for "just things that are obviously possible."

It's a site he regularly spams.
If you check the site before assuming malice, you will find that it is 100% unsourced blog-spam full of misinformation and pleas for cash.

Please don't upvote spam or agendas.
This is both.

[–] Sarcastaway 1 points (+1|-0)

I briefly considered removing his posts, but I decided on leaving them as long as they're infrequent. My issue is not that he links to his own domain. If he primarily posted his work on Phuks it would be the same deal. I'd really prefer that posts here had at least some sort of source, or at least a disclaimer that the content is speculation.

I'm not big on censorship, but there can come a point where excessive self-promotion becomes forum-sliding, which (intentional or not) is in itself an attempt at censorship. But since no one really posts here, I can't make an honest argument that he's actually sliding anything. Maybe at some point in the future that could change.

I still think these articles are designed (both in title and content) to be bait for both the far left and right.

I'm open to thoughts and feedback: @ScorpioGlitch @InnocentBystander @Hockey_Sweater

[–] ScorpioGlitch 2 points (+2|-0)

If it's something that is catching your eye, have you considered a flair? "Self-site post" or something? Lets them post until they become annoying and lets users know?

Because it's not a high rate, I don't consider him to be an issue.
User downvotes are sufficient in my opinion.
Unless things change.

I'm not big on censorship..

I agree, but I don't think this is a censorship issue. It's not his retarded opinions that are the problem. It's the dishonest and spamy actions that are objectionable. I don't see it doing any harm at this point, though.

[–] Hockey_Sweater [OP] 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

As for sources

I harass Warren Kinsella on the internet. He's one of the guys who made it possible for us to go on and on about Adolf Hitler as we flooded the country with people from racist, homophobic 3rd World shitholes.

He's even retweeted me.

He had no idea that you have to be brainwashed into population replacement.

I also name the names of some of my teachers HERE, HERE, and HERE.

Plus I get upvoted on Reddit: https://old.reddit.com/r/multiculturalcancer/comments/8n8gmd/how_canada_got_gay/

Spam and pleas for cash? Where are all of these pleas for cash? And spam?

After AIDS homophobia how did Canada get gay positive through mass 3rd World immigration while going on and on about the Holocaust?

[–] Sarcastaway 0 points (+0|-0)

Do you by chance primarily speak a language other than English? If you're using translating service, that would explain why we're having some trouble communicating. Maybe this helps:

"it would be the same deal" = "the situation would not change"

If this isn't a language barrier issue, then let me say that I agree there's a possibility that AIDS has consciously been used as a weapon against 1st world countries by the people the promote open borders and diversity quotas. The problem is that I have no proof, so I can only speculate.

After AIDS homophobia how did Canada get gay positive through mass 3rd World immigration while going on and on about the Holocaust?

Careful, your insanity is showing.
You need to break that up into separate thoughts, then communicate them one at a time, for it to be considered a rational thought.
'Cause right now, it's just gibberish.