Because it's not a high rate, I don't consider him to be an issue.
User downvotes are sufficient in my opinion.
Unless things change.
I'm not big on censorship..
I agree, but I don't think this is a censorship issue. It's not his retarded opinions that are the problem. It's the dishonest and spamy actions that are objectionable. I don't see it doing any harm at this point, though.
Because it's not a high rate, I don't consider him to be an issue.
User downvotes are sufficient in my opinion.
Unless things change.
> I'm not big on censorship..
I agree, but I don't think this is a censorship issue. It's not his retarded opinions that are the problem. It's the dishonest and spamy actions that are objectionable. I don't see it doing any harm at this point, though.
I agree, but I don't think this is a censorship issue.
Just to be clear, I was referring to my potential censorship of his content, should I remove it.
That said, I agree completely.
>I agree, but I don't think this is a censorship issue.
Just to be clear, I was referring to *my* potential censorship of his content, should I remove it.
That said, I agree completely.
I briefly considered removing his posts, but I decided on leaving them as long as they're infrequent. My issue is not that he links to his own domain. If he primarily posted his work on Phuks it would be the same deal. I'd really prefer that posts here had at least some sort of source, or at least a disclaimer that the content is speculation.
I'm not big on censorship, but there can come a point where excessive self-promotion becomes forum-sliding, which (intentional or not) is in itself an attempt at censorship. But since no one really posts here, I can't make an honest argument that he's actually sliding anything. Maybe at some point in the future that could change.
I still think these articles are designed (both in title and content) to be bait for both the far left and right.
I'm open to thoughts and feedback: @ScorpioGlitch @InnocentBystander @Hockey_Sweater