7

Looks pretty clear at this point it was a hoax. Though not 100% sure yet, but ya pretty sure, fake.

Sure smells like libtard false flag.

Maybe some isolated GOP retard, but unlikely.

Who you betting on?

Looks pretty clear at this point it was a hoax. Though not 100% sure yet, but ya pretty sure, fake. Sure smells like libtard false flag. Maybe some isolated GOP retard, but unlikely. Who you betting on?

22 comments

[–] Sarcastaway 1 points (+1|-0)

In most circumstances I'd be on the fence with something like this. But I'm relatively convinced this is some false-flaggary. Here's my thinking:

1) Midterms are around the corner.

2) Photos of a live explosive device seem to have hit the internet before the police even arrived.

3) 8 failed detonations

4) Mostly cliche targets with no real power. These weren't sent to Fienstein or Booker, they were sent to a couple retired politicians with book deals. In other words, these are targets of spite rather than targets of function.

5) The conjunction of points 3 & 4 lead me to think a detonation was never intended. I believe further investigation of the devices will show that they were real bombs, but were not configured to actually explode.

If I had to profile our "bomber," its either the most incompetent fox news-watching cliche republican terrorist of all time, or someone on the left who wants to play to the radical left's stereotype of the cliche republican.

When the radical right gets angry, you get people like Ted Kaczynski and Timothy McVeigh. This new bomber is not one of those.