I'm curious why the pic is still there somewhere even though the source is gone... is a thumbnail saved on the forum?
If, for any reason, I see a domain where root doesn't really display much of anything or just errors (like going here returns a 403), I just block them wholesale. I figure if it's an important domain, it should have something at root.
Or do you mean the click hijacking? So in modern browsers, if you middle click a link, it opens in a new tab. The expando function is toggling instead of treating it like a link. It even fires on a right click.
If, for any reason, I see a domain where root doesn't really display much of anything or just errors (like going [here](https://t.phoxy.win/) returns a 403), I just block them wholesale. I figure if it's an important domain, it should have something at root.
Or do you mean the click hijacking? So in modern browsers, if you middle click a link, it opens in a new tab. The expando function is toggling instead of treating it like a link. It even fires on a right click.
It doesn't open in a new tab because it's an expando. Try clicking the link normally.
Tbh I don't see people blocking it at all. If they do, they'll unblock it when they realise thumbs don't work anymore.
It doesn't open in a new tab because it's an expando. Try clicking the link normally.
Tbh I don't see people blocking it at all. If they do, they'll unblock it when they realise thumbs don't work anymore.
It’s an anchor tag. Overriding default browser behavior without a good requirement is bad. If it seems reasonable to expando it, keep the correct nehavior for the anchor bit put an expando with it.
It’s an anchor tag. Overriding default browser behavior without a good requirement is bad. If it seems reasonable to expando it, keep the correct nehavior for the anchor bit put an expando with it.
Could you elaborate? I'm not sure what you mean.