And how many Jews were in the Europe at the time?
edit: why am I getting downvoted without replys?
What counts as an acurate census?
Any census that counts and interviews every subject, would be accurate.
That's impossible for a country though. A national census is never accurate, it is always an approximation at best.
Even if this census was not acurate, lets say it was off by double, there were still only 1 million people of Jewish heritage in Germany.
Ok, sure. Why does that matter?
> What counts as an acurate census?
Any census that counts and interviews every subject, would be accurate.
That's impossible for a country though. A national census is never accurate, it is always an approximation at best.
> Even if this census was not acurate, lets say it was off by double, there were still only 1 million people of Jewish heritage in Germany.
Ok, sure. Why does that matter?
Ok, sure. Why does that matter?
Where did they pull the 6 mil number?
`Ok, sure. Why does that matter?`
Where did they pull the 6 mil number?
Who is 'they'?
Why do I (or anyone) care if it is 600,000 or 6,000,000? The number may be different, but it's still the same thing.
Nothing changes if we accept 600,000. The Nazi's were still the badguys. Killing jews is still wrong.
Even if the number was only 6,000 how does that change anything?
Who is 'they'?
Why do I (or anyone) care if it is 600,000 or 6,000,000? The number may be different, but it's still the same thing.
Nothing changes if we accept 600,000. The Nazi's were still the badguys. Killing jews is still wrong.
Even if the number was only 6,000 how does that change anything?
What counts as an acurate census? Even if this census was not acurate, lets say it was off by double, there were still only 1 million people of Jewish heritage in Germany.