You know, I was thinking the same thing. They really do sound undervalued for what they are ... historically if nothing else.
You know, I was thinking the same thing. They really do sound undervalued for what they are ... historically if nothing else.
That doesn't sound right. The jewelry store at the local mall has rings that cost more than that.
How could a gem encrusted gold ring, that is older than Jesus, not be worth more? Are they common somewhere?
I must be missing something.