3

If you insist they give up their culture immediately you will be seen as trying to take away their culture. Just like how gun rights advocates perceive attacks on gun culture.

Solidarity is a normal reaction to real or perceived hostility. In history the social pressure to assimilate resulted in immigrant collectivism in order to support each other; Chinatowns, little Italy and a myriad other ethnic enclaves formed partly because of this pressure.

If you insist they give up their culture immediately you will be seen as trying to take away their culture. Just like how gun rights advocates perceive attacks on gun culture. Solidarity is a normal reaction to real or perceived hostility. In history the social pressure to assimilate resulted in immigrant collectivism in order to support each other; Chinatowns, little Italy and a myriad other [ethnic enclaves](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_enclave) formed partly because of this pressure.

26 comments

[–] phoxy [OP] 0 points (+1|-1) Edited

If they would use these laws, then I'm okay. But they are not. Justin Trudeau has decided to ignore them. We have people crossing the border from the US every day now. Once they cross, we just set them up. He is rushing the Syrian refugees as well.

But what is your evidence for this? Reports in the news? There are also news reports detailing the procedure that refugees must go through after being referred from UN refugee camps. Edit to add: news is not good evidence because it is biased toward sensationalism and extraordinary occurrences.

What evidence do you have for masses crossing from the US? In order to "set them up" these US illegals would have to go through the screening process to be approved for assistance, and they would be discovered to be illegal.

[–] Violentlight 2 points (+2|-0)
[–] phoxy [OP] 1 points (+1|-0) Edited

That isn't evidence that officials just "set them up". That is evidence that officials are abiding by the laws and regulations that I pointed out which govern immigration and refugee processing.

You said there was "unrestricted immigration" and that they were "flooding" in but the link shows otherwise, it shows that there are restrictions in place and that they are being enforced. Getting upset over 0.00002% (of residents) per month is laughable. Even more when they are being apprehended and forced to go through the legitimate process. Edit: and it's not clear what proportion of those few hundred per month are actually entering by illegal border crossing; it has been said before that a majority of "illegal immigration" comes from people who overstay their Visa.

[–] Violentlight 1 points (+1|-0)

I was really drunk last night. So I opted to stop talking.

But your asking for proof of the people not getting caught. The link I gave you would be the closest you can get to that. That is an increased amount of people crossing the border. That is an increased amount of people being caught. Obviously, there are no stats for the people not being caught.

But these people being caught, are being fast tracked. They are not going through the same process as legal immigrants. They have no benefit to us. They had no benefit to the US. They never bothered to get citizenship there. We are spending resources to process these people. Then we are taking our tax money to provide for them. All for people who skip the tedious process of getting into our country properly.