5

Do you think black people should be forced to bake burning cross cakes for klansmen?

Do you think Jews should be forced to bake swastika cakes for neo-nazis?

Should the Muslim baker be forced to draw muhammad fucking a goat if I want to celebrate the day Trump dropped a MOAB?

This is not discrimination and is not comparable to something like the fair housing act.

The very notion of using the govt. to force someone else to do work for you is akin to slavery.

When you protect individual rights you protect group rights.

So now they're after the baker once more b/c he didn't want to bake a tranny cake b/c of whatever his religious beliefs are.

Pay close attention to the wording in this article. He never refused to sell anyone a cake. He refused to make one to those specifications.

A nazi goes to buy a house that has the star of david painted on it. He wants the house but doesn't want it as is. Is the nazi being discriminated against b/c he can't force the jew to paint over it for him so the house is to his specifications?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/08/15/baker-claims-religious-persecution-again-this-time-after-denying-cake-for-transgender-woman/?utm_term=.93739b746d28

The straight gigolo refuses to suck the dick of the gay client that walks into his brothel. By this logic the gay guy was discriminated against b/c he didn't get his blowjob.

It's this simple. It works for me. It works for you.

edit : changed bottom link to the Gadsden Flag as I accidentally linked the article twice leaving it out.

Do you think black people should be forced to bake burning cross cakes for klansmen? Do you think Jews should be forced to bake swastika cakes for neo-nazis? Should the Muslim baker be forced to draw muhammad fucking a goat if I want to celebrate the day Trump dropped a MOAB? >This is not discrimination and is not comparable to something like the fair housing act. The very notion of using the govt. to force someone else to do work for you is akin to slavery. >When you protect individual rights you protect group rights. So now they're after the baker once more b/c he didn't want to bake a tranny cake b/c of whatever his religious beliefs are. >Pay close attention to the wording in this article. He never refused to sell anyone a cake. He refused to make one to those specifications. A nazi goes to buy a house that has the star of david painted on it. He wants the house but doesn't want it as is. Is the nazi being discriminated against b/c he can't force the jew to paint over it for him so the house is to his specifications? https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/08/15/baker-claims-religious-persecution-again-this-time-after-denying-cake-for-transgender-woman/?utm_term=.93739b746d28 The straight gigolo refuses to suck the dick of the gay client that walks into his brothel. By this logic the gay guy was discriminated against b/c he didn't get his blowjob. [It's this simple. It works for me. It works for you.](https://imgoat.com/uploads/00da03b685/138561.jpg) edit : changed bottom link to the Gadsden Flag as I accidentally linked the article twice leaving it out.

6 comments

[–] Sarcastaway 1 points (+1|-0)

A nazi goes to buy a house that has the star of david painted on it. He wants the house but doesn't want it as is. Is the nazi being discriminated against b/c he can't force the jew to paint over it for him so the house is to his specifications?

Find me a jew that wouldn't cover up his religion to make a sale, and I'll show you a man that isn't even remotely jewish.

Anyways, no one should be forced to bake cakes. Its authoritarian nonsense, and the only people who would support such a thing are legitimate fascists that don't deserve cake.