I upvoted to counteract and for the core argument.
But I found this piece to be a heavy on the opinion and derogatory sentiment.
I'm not necessarily against a lot of accusations, as many of them are quite accurate.
But I found over all it was ham fisted in the authors over all approach.
This is information that should be acknowledged by all. But the language and style used, caters to the anti trump crowd.
Which defeats the purpose of who needs to hear these truths most.
I upvoted to counteract and for the core argument.
But I found this piece to be a heavy on the opinion and derogatory sentiment.
I'm not necessarily against a lot of accusations, as many of them are quite accurate.
But I found over all it was ham fisted in the authors over all approach.
This is information that should be acknowledged by all. But the language and style used, caters to the anti trump crowd.
Which defeats the purpose of who needs to hear these truths most.
Thought not