They don't have to actually read bills as long as it has a name that no one can vote against. I mean, who wouldn't vote to stop domestic terrorism?!?
They don't have to actually read bills as long as it has a name that no one can vote against. I mean, who wouldn't vote to stop domestic terrorism?!?
First 8 pages are headlines from the news. Next 9 pages are spent defining terms and creating positions to spend more tax dollars. Last 2 pages are vague paragraphs about task forces and "appropriating" funds.
This bill is practically incoherent. Did any of the sponsors read it?