0

24 comments

[–] Sarcastaway 1 points (+1|-0)

Fair question. He's a legitimate and self-admitted psychopath. He admits that he only exists to make money, regardless of who it hurts. He plays his money games, attacks entire economies, and claims he only does so to only to illustrate their weakness. He's also a legendary hypocrite.

And for the record, he was a nazi collaborator of sorts. He was a teenager, and was pretending to be a christian to escape deportation, but a collaborator nonetheless. I'm not sure I fully believe his limited involvement, but that's neither here nor there.

If you doubt any of the above, watch the full interview I linked. Its all there.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

He's a legitimate and self-admitted psychopath.

Do you have a source for that? He doesn't say it in the interview you (and Phuksmulder) linked.

[–] Sarcastaway 0 points (+0|-0)

He doesn't use the word psychopath, but he clearly says he feels no guilt about the nazi collaboration, and while referring to himself in the third person: "it's one person, who at one time engages in amoral activities, and the rest of the time tries to be moral."

A person with a conscience does not try to be moral. A moral person does not set out to commit amoral acts.

And if you really need further convincing, look at the mans face during these 5 seconds.

So now that I've laid out Soros' own points about himself, maybe you can share what you think about the man?

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)

He's a legitimate and self-admitted psychopath.

So what you are saying is that you think he is a psychopath. That is is very different from where you started out