You joke, but I wouldn't put it past him to have one of his people do that so he could play the victim.
You joke, but I wouldn't put it past him to have one of his people do that so he could play the victim.
You joke, but I wouldn't put it past him to have one of his people do that so he could play the victim.
This seems fishy. If you're working from within, and you have any amount of sway, why oust yourself? Anonymous or not, it defeats the purpose. All this does is cause chaos and mistrust within the administration this anonymous staffer claims to support.
Furthermore, am I really supposed to believe that the whitehouse doesn't have surveillance on every single person who works there? I find it really hard to believe this person's identity is really a mystery to them.