2

13 comments

[–] InnocentBystander -1 points (+0|-1) Edited

Ah, your usual reserved response.

Ah your usual attack Inno unprovoked, and then cry when he's not nice enough in his reply. You attacked me, remember? It is always you who starts it with me.
Why do you ask for it if you're going to get so upset? Grow a pair.

They haven't done anything wrong in my eyes

Then you're an idiot. You've said some dumb things before, but this is a whole new level.

If you look at his account you will see someone who has only ever posted polarizing political articles, and does not upvote anything.
You know that is the antithesis of what the admins have stated as their desire. What you have said was your desire along with almost all of the community.

The butt-hurt is strong with you.

their willingness to have a sincere extended conversation

There is at proof above that this is false.
I can't argue with your denial of what is in front of us. Your hatred of me has shorted out what little brainpower you had. I don't know if I should be sad, or proud of my influence on you.

[–] smallpond 1 points (+1|-0)

their willingness to have a sincere extended conversation

There is at proof above that this is false.

I was referring to the conversation in this post. Having been there before, I do sympathize with another person spending time earnestly trying to get through to you with reason.

I have no more interest in "attacking" you than I have in conversing with any other mentally ill person. If you want to be a positive influence on the site, maybe try not to harass and bully other users. Perhaps you can more often put me in the odd position of feeling obliged to support you, as has happened recently.

We have some prominent users who hardly upvote anything at all, and last I checked politically polarizing articles weren't against the TOS. It's up to the admins to make rules that exclude 'bad' users, however they choose to define them. That seems much better than relying on your esteemed instincts and willingness to play batman.

I was referring to the conversation in this post.

Are you so far gone that you think that was a 'sincere conversation'?
Really?

I have no more interest in "attacking" you than

And yet you did. You are so full of shit.

I do sympathize with another person spending time earnestly trying to get through to you with reason.

How would you know until you try? You keep trying to use your feelings and butt-hurt, without success, so a new strategy might be a good idea.

We have some prominent users who hardly upvote anything at all

Don't compare them to a troll.
I understand that nuance is lost on you, but I think even you can spot the difference.

It's up to the admins to make rules that exclude 'bad' users, however they choose to define them. That seems much better than relying on your esteemed instincts and willingness to play batman.

I'm not allowed to question motives? I haven't stopped him from doing anything. I just asked questions.
Do you consider questions, or differing opinions to be offensive?
Yes, actually, I guess we've established that you do.
Do you think I give a shit, or even view that as a negative thing?

[–] smallpond 1 points (+1|-0)

My intention was to express a little sympathy for OP after what I see as your unreasonable behavior - as I'm already on your bad side, it's something I can do that maybe others can't.

I'd rather not do that behind your back via PM, so "attacking" you in your eyes, was unavoidable. Hopefully in future we can chat less often.