These things are a bit silly with their phrasing and simplicity. 5 responses is not really enough to answer major issues, and lots of them could have different answers depending on context.
These things are a bit silly with their phrasing and simplicity. 5 responses is not really enough to answer major issues, and lots of them could have different answers depending on context.
Agreed. I tried again and applied the most "MSM understanding" that I could think of and came out as a "Neo-Conservative". I can't say I would agree with either assessments especially without a definition.
Agreed. I tried again and applied the most "MSM understanding" that I could think of and came out as a "Neo-Conservative". I can't say I would agree with either assessments especially without a definition.
It said my closest match was "Neo-Liberalism", however I have no idea what that means since it didn't provide a definition. It seems to me that some of the questions were poorly defined as well which probably messed my results up. For example:
Are they defining welfare as handouts, the constitutional definition of welfare, or a combination of both? Maybe I'll go through the test again and apply the most "MSM understanding" of terms to the questions and see what it labels me as.