The last email does break the timestamp pattern and the name (Z. Byron vs Zachary) but that may be consistent with a different sending device, for example, using a mobile to write the response over lunch.
It's presented as an informal debate in the politics section. That is clearly an opinion piece.
The last email does break the timestamp pattern and the name (Z. Byron vs Zachary) but that may be consistent with a different sending device, for example, using a mobile to write the response over lunch.
It's presented as an informal debate in the politics section. That is clearly an opinion piece.
Emails just aren't written like that. And they fucked up the timestamp format, and even the name format at the end.
It's an excuse to write an opinion piece without calling it an opinion piece.