7

It doesn't seem to break down how many up and how many down. Just the combined score.
Why the change? I think there is a huge difference between something that sits at 1 because nobody voted on it, or sits at 1 after 100 people upvoted it, and another 100 downvoted it.

I also fear that when downvotes are invisible, people are more prone to use them. That is just speculation though.

Edit: Ok, I think I get it. I found the video of @pembo during the code swap.

It doesn't seem to break down how many up and how many down. Just the combined score. Why the change? I think there is a huge difference between something that sits at 1 because nobody voted on it, or sits at 1 after 100 people upvoted it, and another 100 downvoted it. I also fear that when downvotes are invisible, people are more prone to use them. That is just speculation though. Edit: Ok, I think I get it. [I found the video of @pembo during the code swap.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YlDKCt2PoWg)

4 comments

[–] Polsaker 2 points (+2|-0) Edited

I won't add the user totals back, because they'll clutter the navbar, but I'm not against adding them back on posts and comments