9

It seems obvious right?
But it's not. It is a slang term that has no hard definition. It gets used very differently by different people.
I think most people more or less agree on the definition, but there are outliers who need it spelled out for them.

By posting a definition in the TOS or elsewhere, it could shut-down some unintentional spamming, and also makes the trolling a bit harder.
In past I have used this: "Spam being defined as irrelevant posts, chronic reposting, or advertising"
But due to some extreme retardation in past, I would add "Spam can take any form of message. Comments, posts, private messages, phone calls, smoke-signals, or other".

It seems obvious right? But it's not. It is a slang term that has no hard definition. It gets used very differently by different people. I think most people more or less agree on the definition, but there are outliers who need it spelled out for them. By posting a definition in the TOS or elsewhere, it could shut-down some unintentional spamming, and also makes the trolling a bit harder. In past I have used this: "*Spam being defined as irrelevant posts, chronic reposting, or advertising*" But due to some extreme retardation in past, I would add "*Spam can take any form of message. Comments, posts, private messages, phone calls, smoke-signals, or other*".

33 comments

[–] PMYA 6 points (+6|-0)

To be honest I don't the kind of user that submits spam posts is the kind of user that is going to read the TOS.

Having said that, I mostly agree with that definition of spam. Sometimes irrelevant posts are spam, sometimes its just someone not understanding the sub properly. We've actually been talking recently about what to do with off topic posts. We could let mods move them to another sub without the post being deleted, have it automatically move to a catch-all off topic sub or just stick with deleting it and telling users to repost it themselves.

A couple of things in the TOS are vague for a reason though, such as the spam part and the part about removing mods.

Content deemed to be spam will be removed, and continuous posting of such content may result in a ban. Moderators are not a part of site staff, and may be removed at any time, for any reason.

Mainly so nobody can complain about technicalities if they are removed as a mod, for example.

[–] InnocentBystander [OP] 2 points (+2|-0) Edited

To be honest I don't the kind of user that submits spam posts is the kind of user that is going to read the TOS.

That's true, however they may sometimes argue it after the fact ("How could I know?"), but also there will be people who do read the TOS and then attempt to exploit any weak areas. The motives vary, but the behaviour is similar. By stating the obvious it becomes clear for the slow, the trolls, and the misinformed.

Basically, it doesn't hurt any, and it might help.

let mods move them to another sub without the post being deleted,

I like this idea.

A couple of things in the TOS are vague for a reason though

I figured that, and I agree with the Mod part. But I think when dealing with things that affect the regular users it is best to give clear guidance so they are not surprised by any actions.
That's not always possible, but in the case of spam I think it is.

[–] smallpond 1 points (+1|-0)

We could let mods move them to another sub without the post being deleted,

I also like this idea. If there's an off-topic sub it would be nice to flag where the post came from originally.