6

10 comments

[–] Justintoxicated 3 points (+3|-0)
[–] jobes [OP] 1 points (+1|-0)

Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union”

I see and hear a lot of 'out there' opinions but this is the first time I've heard that one lol

[–] doggone 2 points (+2|-0)

It's 90's old, anyways. It goes into the NAFTA Texas corridor thing.

[–] jobes [OP] 2 points (+2|-0)

When an individual who was the subject of a federal terrorism investigation within the last 10 years tries to obtain a firearm, allow the U.S. Attorney General to delay the purchase or transfer for up to ten business days and file an emergency petition in court to prevent the transfer. If the court finds probable cause that the individual is or has been engaged in terrorism, the Attorney General may arrest the individual.

If you were not charged with anything, not convicted of anything, but were for some reason looked at by the FBI then cannot purchase a firearm and a federal court may suddenly decide "yeah you know what arrest this guy".

If you simply were at the Capitol on January 6th, you probably have been "investigated" for "terrorism" and would lose your 2nd amendment rights.

[–] ChadThunderCock 1 points (+2|-1)

Hopefully the SCOTUS strikes down this kind of stuff, but even then it takes a long time.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0)

that sounds scary and all but isnt really factual. the fbi has said repeatedly that it doesnt give a shit about the instagram tourists and legitimate protesters. the likelihood they opened a case on everyone there is very low but any who made threatening comments online before hand might have reason to worry for their 2nd amendment rights. try not to allow yourself to be fearmongered.