I already did. How many times do I need to go over the same ground. Enough already, if you don't agree, you don't agree. However, a commission that did the investigation came to that co9nclusion, and neither you or I have more facts than either of us do.
I already did. How many times do I need to go over the same ground. Enough already, if you don't agree, you don't agree. However, a commission that did the investigation came to that co9nclusion, and neither you or I have more facts than either of us do.
No, you refuse to admit that had the law, as currently written was applied, this may not have occurred. They had just cause to ensure he had NO access to firearms. That's pretty simply their error. Because a few, if any, of those who made the decision not to pursue it may have been victims (even if true), is no excuse for inaction when appropriate. The law is there ... they failed to follow it.