Yet he wouldn't have had a gun if they'd acted appropriately.
Yet he wouldn't have had a gun if they'd acted appropriately.
No, you refuse to admit that had the law, as currently written was applied, this may not have occurred. They had just cause to ensure he had NO access to firearms. That's pretty simply their error. Because a few, if any, of those who made the decision not to pursue it may have been victims (even if true), is no excuse for inaction when appropriate. The law is there ... they failed to follow it.
No, you refuse to admit that had the law, as currently written was applied, this may not have occurred. They had just cause to ensure he had NO access to firearms. That's pretty simply their error. Because a few, if any, of those who made the decision not to pursue it may have been victims (even if true), is no excuse for inaction when appropriate. The law is there ... they failed to follow it.
Anything but acknolwedge that it would not have happened if he did not have a gun.