I don't give a damn. If you do, it's simple to just copy and paste the URL. If I'm doing anything where I'd be concerned about such a thing then I have other means of getting the job done.
Archive sites are slow and have rendering issues with pages, plus have trouble handling links on occasion. So no, I don't believe it should be standard practice.
I'm on a tablet, so much for your "easy archiving". And I don't agree with your stance on privacy versus convinience.
Also, unless you speak on behalf of all users on phuks I don't give a dang that YOU don't care for archiving.
"Is there a doctor in the house?!"
"I'm not a doctor!"
🤔
Also, unless you speak on behalf of all users on phuks I don't give a dang that YOU don't care for archiving.
Likewise. I don't care that you don't agree. I've had this argument ad nauseum already, I'm not changing my posting habits. If you look at the posting habits of others you'll also notice that almost nobody is using an archive service. If you ever post then feel free to use an archiving service yourself, there are no rules against it.
I also feel like you're trying to insult me with that last bit, but honestly it's not effective.
You don't agree that archiving webpages with multi-site tracking should be standard practice?