i was talking about this post, not your comment.
I suppose I should add that I agree the tweet is a harmful one. Not because it is subversive, but because it is dishonest subversion. Does the CDC's art department genuinely think the people getting vaccinated are NPCs? I doubt it. They picked a minimalist art style that is very common in infographics. Big whoop.
> i was talking about this post, not your comment.
I suppose I should add that I agree the tweet is a harmful one. Not because it is subversive, but because it is *dishonest* subversion. Does the CDC's art department genuinely think the people getting vaccinated are NPCs? I doubt it. They picked a minimalist art style that is very common in infographics. Big whoop.
civil rights era civil disobedience may be a better comparison but not by much. not many (though too many still) owe the successes of the movement to the most extreme among them who actively undermined government authority and spread extreme ideology. whether you would consider a sit-in to undermine or just oppose authority i suppose is debatable, though.
i was talking about this post, not your comment.
first off, you can't calculate other peoples' risk for them and by not adhering to public health policy, you endanger others more than yourself (unless you have a condition). second, i'm glad 2 million dead in months sounds fine to you but its not acceptable to normal people. finally, i'm going to want to see that napkin math.