You are some piece of work. Put on your tinfoil hat, okay? I don't want you to freak out.
I labeled them as Soviets because there is no effective difference between their regime and the one putin is running. Putin is a hardcore soviet true believer.
I am discussing the Soviet invasion of Ukraine, an independent nation. I am not discussing US politics or any other distracting point you are trying to inject. So take all your political comparisons and put them back in your pocket. not interested.
Your education, your resume, and any other personal information are not relevant to the topic. Again, stick it in your pocket for later.
Your English comprehension is very poor. There were no insults to your sainted mother, only a suggestion that you talk to her about your word choices when talking to women. Or even to other people. Your post is all over the board with tangential issues. You have a serious reading issue and that, perhaps, explains a lot of your issues.
You're just spare parts, aren't you?
You've been watching Letterkenny...
"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye" -Matthew 7:5
War is propaganda. There is a fog of war. You cannot know the facts now, nor can I. Both of us will be wrong when people examine everything 125 years from now.
Dude, there are literally no Soviets. That empire died.
Putin is a puppet. Every leader requires the support people under them to maintain power. The fewer number of people needed, the more autocratic. The more people needed, the more democratic. (Source: The Dictators Handbook; really an excellent book about selectorate theory).
Yep, George W Bush was a terrible leader and should be in prison for war crimes. He isn't.
Criticising sources is a way to side-step the argument. You can always say "That's not true. You're using a bad source. Really, the New York Post?!" .. and so you can dismiss the Hunter Biden Laptop ... oh wait, that's entirely true. Harvesting organs? Seriously, Alex Jones ... oh shit, that's now true too! If you refuse to acknowledge evidence just due to a source you don't like, without looking at that source's actual record, you're literally cherry picking.
You have literally given zero sources. Zero evidence. Zero anything. I've provided you links. My blog posts has a full list of sources. I've added sources in this thread, which aren't good enough for you, yet you provide zero alternatives. You just insult me, call me uneducated despite the fact my entire eduction and resume are on my fucking website, insult my mother who you don't know, and you have failed in ever possible way to make any coherent argument what-so-ever. You just keep spouting axioms as fact without any actual evidence to back anything up.
You are quite figuratively a sheep; a useful idiot who beckons the drums of war between two nuclear powers.