3

7 comments

[–] smallpond [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Sort of, but far better for the rich to die, not the poor.

[–] CDanger 0 points (+0|-0)

Why is it better for the rich to die? Do they have worse moral virtue?

[–] smallpond [OP] 0 points (+0|-0)

Well, you're sulking rather than discussing, but I said I'd answer.

Obviously because each rich person does many times the environmental damage of each poor person. You can google yourself, but regarding carbon footprint:

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/04/carbon-footprint-gap-between-rich-poor-expanding-study

Perhaps you're suppressing some guilt from treating your slaves badly? That is quite the odd comment above...

[–] CDanger 0 points (+0|-0)

What a boring and single-tracked moral system and metric of goodness to reduce a person's worth down to the amount of carbon they emit. Such a pessimistic, lazy, and unproductive world view too. No wonder nobody wants to get aboard your climate death cult.

[–] smallpond [OP] -1 points (+0|-1)

I'll certainly answer, but you leave me puzzled:

You initially wrote that the 'world has too many people'... given your last comment I have to ask: Why do you think the world has too many people?