Sort of, but far better for the rich to die, not the poor.
Sort of, but far better for the rich to die, not the poor.
Well, you're sulking rather than discussing, but I said I'd answer.
Obviously because each rich person does many times the environmental damage of each poor person. You can google yourself, but regarding carbon footprint:
Perhaps you're suppressing some guilt from treating your slaves badly? That is quite the odd comment above...
Well, you're sulking rather than discussing, but I said I'd answer.
Obviously because each rich person does many times the environmental damage of each poor person. You can google yourself, but regarding carbon footprint:
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/feb/04/carbon-footprint-gap-between-rich-poor-expanding-study
Perhaps you're suppressing some guilt from treating your slaves badly? That is quite the odd comment above...
I'll certainly answer, but you leave me puzzled:
You initially wrote that the 'world has too many people'... given your last comment I have to ask: Why do you think the world has too many people?
I'll certainly answer, but you leave me puzzled:
You initially wrote that the 'world has too many people'... given your last comment I have to ask: Why do you think the world has too many people?
The world has too many people already. It would be a net positive if there were fewer.