The article didn't seem to make clear that anything was paid, or even that Iran admits to having detained the man.
It does seem to be a sort of sideways confirmation that they have him.
The article didn't seem to make clear that anything was paid, or even that Iran admits to having detained the man.
It does seem to be a sort of sideways confirmation that they have him.
Yeah I found it quite confusing as it just repeated itself in no certain terms.
Yeah I found it quite confusing as it just repeated itself in no certain terms.
Well, the take away is that Iran has mentioned the guy.
Well, the take away is that Iran has mentioned the guy.
So we paid $25,000,000 to confirm that they have him and nothing else?