It's the old "prosecute the telephone company for what people are talking about on the phone" bullshit.
Freedom of speech is a human right until it hurts someones profit margin.
“This assertion is irrelevant because ‘human rights’ (and international law generally) have absolutely no bearing on this case, and it would confuse the jury as to the legal standards at issue,” they write.
I hope the judge kicks this into touch.
It's the old "prosecute the telephone company for what people are talking about on the phone" bullshit.
Freedom of speech is a human right until it hurts someones profit margin.
>“This assertion is irrelevant because ‘human rights’ (and international law generally) have absolutely no bearing on this case, and it would confuse the jury as to the legal standards at issue,” they write.
I hope the judge kicks this into touch.
It's the old "prosecute the telephone company for what people are talking about on the phone" bullshit. Freedom of speech is a human right until it hurts someones profit margin.
I hope the judge kicks this into touch.