Minor PR setback

yikes, I'm surprised they wrote an article at all covering his death. I guess we don't 100% know that these are related, but we do know they certainly wouldn't describe any connection between these two events _if they knew_. That's not reassuring at all for people looking to these authoritative sources for truth. Do they think people won't notice their lies of omission? Do they think we're stupid? > biggest challenge is dispelling myths and misinformation about the vaccine...vaccine hesitancy How about leaving people alone and respecting their beliefs? Many of these are not "hesitant" and they're not suffering from "misinformation and myths". There are tons of people with very good reasons for not wanting it and a bunch of people with weird bogus reasons. That's how this works in a free society where people have autonomy and control over their own lives. Their reasons don't matter and are irrelevant red herring because they as a human must be respected regardless. Enough with this dystopian "of course nobody is forcing you, but if you don't... " or "you just need to be reeducated". > WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that the following content contains images of people who have died. real-life trigger warnings... and legitimately racist ones at that. They are simultaneously implying 1. Only aborigines would be offended by seeing dead people for old voodoo reasons 2. If you're an aborigine, this is how you should behave. Don't deviate from this stereotype, and you'd be wrong to adopt a different culture or set of beliefs 3. Nobody else would possibly be offended by this I didn't even read these whole articles, just skimmed and saw glaring examples. Everyday I hate the media more and more