If a plan can't be laid out in at least its broad strokes on a Twitter thread, then it is a deliberately obtuse scam not intended to solve anything.
If a plan can't be laid out in at least its broad strokes on a Twitter thread, then it is a deliberately obtuse scam not intended to solve anything.
Why not both?
- NGOs like this are very wasteful and corrupt
- World hunger is a complex problem that throwing a few billion won't completly fix
- That's probably Musk's original point
- But I'm sure even with wasteful bureaucracy the situation could be improved, so Musk comes across as an autistic ass by making an argument about this and avoiding that he could make a big positive impact here if we wanted
- Musk is a Twitter shitposter who probably wouldn't accept a plan if it came from Jesus himself
Why not both?
* NGOs like this are very wasteful and corrupt
* World hunger is a complex problem that throwing a few billion won't completly fix
- That's probably Musk's original point
- But I'm sure even with wasteful bureaucracy the situation could be improved, so Musk comes across as an autistic ass by making an argument about this and avoiding that he could make a big positive impact here if we wanted
* Musk is a Twitter shitposter who probably wouldn't accept a plan if it came from Jesus himself
Can we also have ?
D) all of the above
Can we also have ?
D) all of the above
I get that these kinds of organizations are huge bureaucracies of waste, funneling money to special interests, corrupt, etc
BUT
expecting any plan for transparency on how to spend $6B on a Twitter thread is pretty dumb. Wrong venue. Could anybody show an accounting of how they'd spend even $6M for a project that already exists and was successful in a Twitter thread? Something like
labor: $541,0023
materials: $1,939,117
utilities: $27,0332
etc would just get called lacking in detail.