He has great grounds for appeals, but unfortunately the chief justice of the Minneapolis appellate court is a lefty jew that went to Berkley, so I'm not seeing that actually going anywhere.
He has great grounds for appeals, but unfortunately the chief justice of the Minneapolis appellate court is a lefty jew that went to Berkley, so I'm not seeing that actually going anywhere.
Sooooo many problems with that trial. Not in the least that the 3 charges are mutually exclusive. It's sort of like asking what's your favorite color and getting "All of them" in response.
I'm kinda surprised he didn't get charged with jaywalking, littering, Holocaust denial, and pet abuse as well. There are lot of other laws in the book so why stop at just 3?
I'd love to hear the judge's candid thoughts on the whole thing.