In theory its not a bad idea. But it seems like a fair amount of the rights talking points are more conspiracy than politics. Should fiscal budget planning be seated alongside Qanon nuttery?
In theory its not a bad idea. But it seems like a fair amount of the rights talking points are more conspiracy than politics. Should fiscal budget planning be seated alongside Qanon nuttery?
In theory its not a bad idea.
Yes it is. Media, including social media is considered the fourth pillar of a free nation. If the executive restricts media, it's often considered an unfree state, like China or Russia, would be a shame to see the US go that way.
> In theory its not a bad idea.
Yes it is. Media, including social media is considered the fourth pillar of a free nation. If the executive restricts media, it's often considered an unfree state, like China or Russia, would be a shame to see the US go that way.
A free and independent media is the fourth pillar. This country has neither.
A free and independent media is the fourth pillar. This country has neither.
Honestly until I can get an actual copy of the order I have no idea what this legislation actually would mean. However it seems to draw from the publisher/forum debate which has a lot of interesting caveats.
Honestly until I can get an actual copy of the order I have no idea what this legislation actually would mean. However it seems to draw from the publisher/forum debate which has a lot of interesting caveats.
So I was looking for a copy of the executive order itself but was unable to find one. One article I read said it was heavily based on the following bill:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1914/text
I really wish I could get a copy because I would not trust any online media to report this correctly.