Prosecutors have a lot of discretion when it comes to creative prosecutions. If the defendant has a shitty lawyer, the prosecutor might even win, establishing the legal precedent now lacking.
Prosecutors have a lot of discretion when it comes to creative prosecutions. If the defendant has a shitty lawyer, the prosecutor might even win, establishing the legal precedent now lacking.
For such a charge to hold up they would have to prove he had the virus at the time of the events. Also I don't think there is a precedent legally for charging someone with spreading a virus as a terrorist.