[–] [Deleted] 4 points (+4|-0) Lmfao. I agree we should such identification. Not so sure on the choice of the identifier. Lmfao. I agree we should such identification. Not so sure on the choice of the identifier. permalink source [–] ohphukimintrouble [OP] 5 points (+5|-0) Not so sure on the choice of the identifier. You'd know it's OP. >Not so sure on the choice of the identifier. You'd know it's OP. permalink source [–] [Deleted] 3 points (+3|-0) Edited True, it is well documented that OP is a fag. True, it is well documented that OP is a fag. permalink source
[–] ohphukimintrouble [OP] 5 points (+5|-0) Not so sure on the choice of the identifier. You'd know it's OP. >Not so sure on the choice of the identifier. You'd know it's OP. permalink source [–] [Deleted] 3 points (+3|-0) Edited True, it is well documented that OP is a fag. True, it is well documented that OP is a fag. permalink source
[–] [Deleted] 3 points (+3|-0) Edited True, it is well documented that OP is a fag. True, it is well documented that OP is a fag. permalink source
Lmfao.
I agree we should such identification. Not so sure on the choice of the identifier.