9

Human porn stars will be replaced by 'virtual actors' in the future as viewers choose polygons over people

(www.mirror.co.uk)

posted by soylentglitter on Whatever

4 comments

[–] THC 2 points (+2|-0)

fraction of the cost.

Clearly they did not look into how fucking crazy expensive life like cgi is and how much power is needed to render it in perfect 1080p. I don't think we're in danger of losing our lusty stars any time soon.

[–] Mattvision 1 points (+1|-0)

Life like

.

1080p

Those standards don't apply to a large percentage of viewers.

[–] THC 0 points (+0|-0)

Is there a majority of viewers who prefer the cgi over real flesh? Standard porn sites seem to paint the opposite picture.

[–] Mattvision 1 points (+1|-0)

It's a niche, but enough for an active market.