That's an admirable statement, but let me play the devil's advocate. What if all he's qualified for is pushing a broom or bussing tables?
That's an admirable statement, but let me play the devil's advocate. What if all he's qualified for is pushing a broom or bussing tables?
So he doesn't deserve to afford a minimal existence without walfare?
So he doesn't deserve to afford a minimal existence without walfare?
First question: Does he? Second question: Why is it someone else's responsibility to provide him with that? Third question: How long would $15 an hour be enough for a minimal existence as prices rise because of increased labor costs?
First question: Does he?
Second question: Why is it someone else's responsibility to provide him with that?
Third question: How long would $15 an hour be enough for a minimal existence as prices rise because of increased labor costs?
Whatever he's qualified for.