I think every mainstream news source is going to publish some articles that qualify as being full of shit. I appreciate a lot of what The Guardian puts out, but I accept they publish rubbish too. If you did find anyone who believes in the Guardian religiously, this probably isn't the article that's going to break the spell for them.
Anyway, I should have archived the article as Phila did.
I think *every* mainstream news source is going to publish some articles that qualify as being full of shit. I appreciate a lot of what The Guardian puts out, but I accept they publish rubbish too. If you did find anyone who believes in the Guardian religiously, this probably isn't the article that's going to break the spell for them.
Anyway, I should have archived the article as Phila did.
Anyway, I should have archived the article as Phila did.
Bad smallpond, flicks nose bad
>Anyway, I should have archived the article as Phila did.
Bad smallpond, *flicks nose* bad
Well if no one pays "attention" then no one may tell another that a news source they were misled into trusting may be full of shit. It may seem obnoxious to point this out, but is potentially worthwhile