5

6 comments

[–] [Deleted] 2 points (+2|-0)

What owner did is clearly against the law. Should that be the law? I'm not sure, it would certainly be a crime deterrent.

[–] [Deleted] 0 points (+0|-0) Edited

It is weird how many police vids I’ve seen over the years where police shot an unarmed person fleeing. They never seem to get charged. I wouldn’t shoot a shoplifter fleeing.

[–] xyzzy 2 points (+2|-0)

You got to be reasonable. Shooting in the chest from this distance over 36$ isn't. There clearly was an option to aim somewhere where it wouldn't risk the thieves live in such danger. On the other hand, it's not like the shooter had a lot of time to think about his actions; he did the wrong thing in a stress situation.

The lawyer fees are going to cost far more than the stolen beer would have.
This was very stupid.

Killing someone who is not a threat, is murder and unethical, in my opinion.

[–] heywoodnj 1 points (+1|-0)

Getting shot over 2 racks of natty ice? Re-examine your life choices. Lethal force? Big no from me.....Taking out a tire or 4?...That I might think about.

[–] [Deleted] 1 points (+1|-0)

I Wouldn’t shoot someone over beer. I’m guessing their store is in a ghetto area. If you have a store in the ghetto you’d have to shoot like 3 people at least every day. Easier to just buy insurance. Who’s gonna shop in your store when there’s daily gun battles?