From the first paragraph of the article.
There cannot be many doctors as thoroughly discredited and ostracised as Andrew Wakefield has been in the UK who are subsequently seen smiling at the inauguration ball of a US president
From the first paragraph of the article.
>There cannot be many doctors as thoroughly discredited and ostracised as Andrew Wakefield has been in the UK who are subsequently seen smiling at the inauguration ball of a US president
How does that connect Trump to the man?
It doesn't.
I once saw a picture of Churchill.
Am I connected to him? Or do I have to smile?
How does that connect Trump to the man?
It doesn't.
I once saw a picture of Churchill.
Am I connected to him? Or do I have to smile?
Despite the impressive display of mental gymnastics, the writer fails to make any connection between "Trump's America" and Mr.Wakefield.
The Guardian jams Trumps name into any negative title they have, because $ales are more important than facts.