That's not what your studies are saying. You're extrapolating based off related, but different, factors.
It seems like you're looking for ways to back-up a preexisting dogma.
Those 'studies' barely hold up under their own weight, and they certainly do not back your barbaric view of men.
believed themselves to have been outperformed by a woman in the same room with them tended to rate her as less attractive and showed less desire to exchange contact information or plan a date with her.
They are comparing competitors. I bet that holds true when you change the gender roles, or use the same genders. There was no control group in that deeply flawed analysis.
Perceived intelligence is positively associated with friendliness and a sense of humour in both sexes, “but negatively related with perceived dominance in faces of women
The existence of a "Smart women can be bossy", stereotype does not imply a fear or rejection of powerful women. This actually says they are positively associated also, so that negates it as evidence, even if it was saying what you thought.
Those were very bad, deeply biased sources that failed to follow the scientific method.
In most western communities successful women are 'high-value' from a male perspective.
If you live somewhere that women are expected to be weak, move.
"A lot" = a significant number
there was that podcast I linked earlier that goes into this in detail
but see this
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-couch/201601/do-men-have-problem-dating-smart-women
also
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/relationships/11899840/Why-do-some-men-run-a-mile-from-intelligent-women.html
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0146167215599749?etoc=&
so yes, actual data
also see
http://bigthink.com/elise-bohan/women-have-a-biological-advantage-on-dating-apps