7

16 comments

[–] Polsaker 3 points (+3|-0)

Sadly, that happens on every site where everybody can vote

[–] THC [OP] 4 points (+4|-0)

It's all well until it's used to suppress an individual and inflate the hive mind. I truly believe that as long as the atmosphere here maintains a bipartisan attitude that it can end up becoming the status quo to allow individuals to have their due say as long as it legitimately contributes to discussion or content.

[–] TheRedArmy 4 points (+4|-0)

(ranting madly) I'm a Libertarian! I reject the bi-partisan dichotomy the left and the right would perpetuate for eternity! There is a third option! I say we reject the horrors of the left and the horrors of the right in favor of freedom! DOWN WITH GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE! FREEDOM FOR THE PEOPLE! LIBERTY FOR ALL! (Incoherent German) :p

No, but I'm the same way. I'm personally very stingy with votes in either direction, although I've loosened up on here a bit (upvotes at least). I'll happily read basically any post as long as it's coherent and cordial.

[–] THC [OP] 3 points (+3|-0)

Then maybe a better term for what I was thinking would be Omni-Partisan, it can be another pun like meaning to OP. "That discussion was OP as fuck"

[–] jidlaph 1 points (+1|-0)

Ultimately I think the standard voting formula does nothing to discourage such behavior. If we want to avoid the same pitfalls as reddit, digg, voat, etc then we will need something different. Exactly what that is I don't know.