You should try reading those links. You would learn a lot.
They don't say what you think.
"Holy Roman" empire was not ancient Rome. I know the name is confusing, it was popular. But they are not the same thing.
Read your own links, they show you're wrong.
And weren't you just telling me that wikipedia and history channel were in some conspiracy against you?
Now you trust them? Well, good, read it. Lear how stupid you're sounding.
The rome city was built by roman people and it stayed as a shadow of rome until the Renaissance
Rome the city, not Rome the empire. Are you still confused about the difference?
you see, religion did play a big part and it was the reason why rome fell.
No. That is an incorrect statement.
I suggest you do some reading. Maybe start with the links you or I have included in this thread.
Because you're making yourself look like a retard.
aha! jokes on you because all those articles and everyone in rome knows christianity became the official religion, plues italy never counted rome as part of their land: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italy#Ancient_Rome
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_province
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Roman_Emperor#Holy_Roman_Emperors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Italy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vatican_City
https://www.history.com/news/10-things-you-may-not-know-about-the-vatican
https://www.catholic.com/qa/is-the-vatican-really-a-country
http://www.cgpgrey.com/blog/vatican-city-explained
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-17994868
https://www.britannica.com/place/Rome/People
The rome city was built by roman people and it stayed as a shadow of rome until the Renaissance, then return to being a shadow of rome after many years later when late modern day record everything.
you see, religion did play a big part and it was the reason why rome fell.